Brit accuses US of snooping

The European Parliament received a detailed report last week that contains evidence of a 10-year effort by the US government to use its intelligence technology to help US companies win commercial contracts.

          The European Parliament received a detailed report last week that contains evidence of a 10-year effort by the US government to use its intelligence technology to help US companies win commercial contracts.

          The report was by a British journalist hired by the European Parliament to investigate a global electronic eavesdropping network.

          The so-called Echelon network is run by an alliance among the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The report came as a panel of experts testified in Europe last week that the US isn’t the only country plucking sensitive corporate and economic data from the internet and airwaves.

          "I referred many times [in the report] to the fact that European countries ran satellite [signal intelligence] systems to collect intelligence," Duncan Campbell, the author of the report, told Computerworld US.

          France and Germany are also known to employ modern technologies designed to collect economic intelligence that would help firms in those countries. Europeans are "open-minded and readily accept that our companies and governments — like [the US]" spy, bribe and cheat on occasions, Campbell says. "The European inquiry is going ahead on that basis."

          In his study, Campbell accused Lexington, Massachusetts-based Raytheon of receiving information from Echelon that allowed it to outbid two French firms in 1994 for a $US1.4 billion contract with the Brazilian government for a system to monitor any environmental changes in the rain forests there. A Raytheon official called the charges groundless.

          "Raytheon won the [contract] because it had the best technical solution and the lowest price and best financial proposal," a company spokesman says.

          Neil MacCormick, a vice chairman of the European Parliament’s special commission on Echelon, calls Campbell’s testimony sober and balanced. The use of Echelon, particularly its Advocacy Center, which helps US businesses overcome unfair trading practices, is well documented, says MacCormick.

          "It therefore follows that some of the output of Echelon is used in contexts of economic intelligence affecting the interests of non-US businesses," he says.

          "Many European nations should look into the mirror before complaining about economic espionage by other nations," says Cees Wiebes, a professor at the University of Amsterdam who testified last week before the parliament of the Netherlands.

          According to Wiebes, many Dutch multinationals — including Philips Electronics and Royal Dutch/Shell Group — have received intelligence gathered by the Dutch equivalent of the US National Security Agency (NSA) to support construction projects at airports and seaports.

          But US intelligence officials insisted that Echelon isn’t used to covertly assist US companies in their efforts to win contracts around the world. They say Echelon is used to uncover international fraud schemes, criminal activity and terrorist groups.

          A spokesman for the NSA, which manages the Echelon network, says the agency operates in strict accordance with US laws that prohibit the agency from providing "intelligence information to private firms for their economic advantage."

          A former CIA official familiar with NSA operations who spoke on the condition of anonymity says he finds the claims of assistance to US firms by the NSA hard to believe — except in cases involving specific military technologies. Campbell and the European Union are "overplaying the economic espionage aspect of Echelon," he says.

          Executives in the US also discounted claims made during an European Parliament hearing last November that US-produced software such as Microsoft’s Windows operating system contains back doors that support Echelon activities.

          Steve Lipner, manager of Microsoft’s Security Response Center, says the best example of Microsoft’s position on Echelon and of not allowing back doors to be implanted in its software is evident in its opposition to legislation that would require companies to share encryption keys with federal law enforcement.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

More about EchelonEuropean ParliamentMicrosoftNational Security AgencyNSAPhilipsPhilips Electronics AustraliaRaytheon Australia

Show Comments