Server virtualisation alternatives growing

Open source alternatives and new features in upcoming server operating systems are reducing VMware's competitive advantage

Last year, many enterprise IT groups saw potential in virtualisation, rushed to consolidate servers and subsequently propelled virtualisation vendor VMware to a market-leading spot. As 2007 begins, VMware’s prices are under attack, just as more CIOs look to virtualisation to control server and storage sprawl and tame datacentre power costs.

For starters, VMware rivals XenSource and Virtual Iron Software have launched new open-source alternatives, undercutting VMware on price. Also, new processors — such as IBM’s Power 5 and upcoming Power 6 chips — and new operating systems have virtualisation capabilities built in, negating the need for some additional software, says Clay Ryder, president of The Sageza Group. Sun Microsystems’ Solaris 10 operating system includes a virtualisation feature it calls Containers. Microsoft is expected to release a beta version of Windows Virtual Server in the first quarter of 2007 and ship it a year later.

That’s good news: As virtualisation features become part of the hardware or the OS, software providers will have to offer useful extra features, Ryder says, such as automated new software testing or security patch management.

Both XenSource and Virtual Iron build their proprietary products on top of the open-source Xen platform for virtualisation hypervisors. (A hypervisor lets a computer run multiple operating systems at once.) VMware’s products are not based on open source.

Meanwhile, middleware vendor BEA Systems is making its own cost-cutting move. In the first half of this year, BEA plans to release WebLogic Server Virtual Edition (WLS-VE), a version of its Java application server that includes Liquid VM, a BEA-specific Java Virtual Machine that lets Java applications run directly on a hypervisor without requiring an operating system to be present. This will let users substantially reduce the amount of computer power they consume, lowering the hardware costs per application, says Guy Churchward, vice president and general manager of the Java Runtime Products Group at BEA Systems. Initially, Liquid VM will work only with VMware’s ESX Server hypervisor.

Analysts advise CIOs planning for virtualisation in 2007 to think strategically, not just tactically.

“To really make virtualisation work, you want to do it so end users access capability, not just specific machines,” Ryder says. “That’s only going to be possible if you take a strategic approach,” he says, noting that virtualisation needs to be applied to storage, networking and the introduction of new software, not just servers.

Mike Williams, CIO for the US Defence Contract Management Agency (DCMA), learned a lesson about thinking strategically when he did a virtualisation project in 2006. Williams deployed VMware, reducing the agency’s number of servers from 560 to 160 and the number of datacentres from 17 to three. But that move taxed the WAN when all the network traffic converged on the three datacentres. His advice: Optimise the WAN first.

Still, Williams likes the results. Before virtualisation, DCMA replaced about a third of its 560 servers annually at a cost of about US$2 million (NZ$2.8 million), Williams says; virtualisation cut that expense to US$560,000.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags managementserversvirtualisation

Show Comments