- A populace armed with cam phones
- The great leap backwards
In an office far removed from productivity
"The IPv6 version has extra scenes and extra colour support."
Masterpiece! Shame I hate Star Bores though. He should do War and Peace.
(This link will open a telnet window. To quit, press Ctrl-] and q.)
"Well, it seemed like a good idea at the time."
A populace armed with cam phones
Luckily nobody was killed in the latest round of terror bombs in London, and only person was injured. As have been reported before, people in the midst of the horror are using digital cameras in their phones to snap pictures of what's going on. Some say it's citizens' journalism, others think it ghoulish voyeurism.
That cam-phones should be used to gather evidence against the terrorists is an interesting twist though. The British police are canvassing images from readers, which is quite odd really because that country is carpeted in CCTV cameras, with just about everyone's likeness being recorded a few times a day.
I'm not sure what to think of this. On the one hand, if it leads to the bombers getting caught, great, but it does also reinforce what Scott McNealy of Sun Microsystems said: "You have zero privacy anyway - get over it".
The great leap backwards
When I got Telecom ADSL for the first time in 1999, it ran at the then amazing speed of around 6Mbit/s towards me, and 750kbit/s towards the rest of the world. The usage bills were pretty amazing too, but Telecom promised they would get lower eventually.
This they did after much too long, but the price for that was a much lower standard of service. It's now 2005, and the best Telecom can offer is 2Mbit/s down and 128kbit/s up. This is an improvement on the 256kbit/s download speed service that was the first to feature billing that wasn't a financial suicide, but with the choked-off upstream pipe and low 10GB monthly data limit, it's still pretty poor compared to just about everywhere else.
Will the situation improve? Telecom isn't keen: it says that there is no demand for the higher speed plans, so it's now hiding them and worse, killing off the JetStream Partnering Programme that ISPs were able to sell full-rate DSL under. Since most ISPs aren't willing to resell DSL under the low-margin but high-risk Telecom Wholesale Services Agreement that apparently (we are not entirely sure) would have the full-rate DSL, their customers face life in the slow, 2Mbps/128kbps max UBS lane.
Overseas however customers are enjoying faster speeds and lower prices. Isn't it funny how the demand is there and not here?
The low-grade DSL is turning into a commercial millstone around third-party ISPs' necks as well but that's not a surprise. We said it would right from the launch of UBS. The only surprising thing is that so many ISPs decided ignore this obvious fact and go with UBS.