Net TV won't lead to a gated web

There's nothing to fear, says Tom Yager

Within the next two weeks, I'll be getting in deep with the Mac and PC technology that will take us into the next decade of internet with every TV. This time, I'm certain it'll catch. Intel's Viiv internet media hub initiative isn't just a brand; it's an orgy of partnerships between system component makers, broadband providers, content owners and electronics giants. Apple, as is its tradition, is partnering with itself, making access to the iTunes Music Store and its .Mac online service an infrared-remote click away through Mac systems and its ingenious Front Row iPod-like GUI.

Having computers sink roots in retail outlets' consumer electronics departments is not only a turning point for technology, but a turning point in the perceived structure of the web. These little boxes won't change the web per se, but they will change the way the gross majority of Americans navigate the web and choose the content they consume. Without being an alarmist about it, I consider it entirely likely that internet via remote control will give us what we desperately need: zero-effort, zero-thought access to the internet's massive content grid. However, some fear that corporate gatekeepers will decide where most Americans enter the grid and the paths they'll take to trip about inside it.

I have good reasons for not freaking out about this. First, internet access from every TV means that millions of businesspeople who now wake to Headline News, Bloomberg or the Wall Street Journal will now be peering over their morning coffee at channels they created. They're more likely to carry information about the business you're in.

The other reason I'm not ringing alarm bells is that a gated web will be, whether vendors intend it or not, eminently hackable. People who generate non-commercial content but can't get it seen will get together to hot-wire into vendors' gloriously easy remote-control interfaces to add channels of their own. Genuinely independent music and visual content will pop up as thumbnails alongside commercial offerings. Non-commercial podcasts, photocasts and all kinds of casts will get grafted into appliances' menu hierarchies and be heard and seen by millions who never knew all that awesome content was there.

If they're smart, vendors will make this easy. I feel confident that Apple will maintain OS X as an accessible underlayer on its home-theater appliances. They'll always be Macs, therefore they'll always be able jump the iTunes Music Store and .Mac tracks to deliver rich content and applications created by the imaginative people who make up the fast-growing Mac community. Likewise, I'm hopeful that most Viiv-based appliances will open themselves to custom applications, although my expectations for customisation of embedded Viiv hardware inside cable boxes and TVs are understandably low.

Making access to the web's massive content grid as simple as running a DVD player or iPod is a welcome mat for people who don't have the time or interest to scour the web and pluck out the good stuff that's already there. Like it or not, that describes most people. Concerns about gatekeepers' limits on what can be seen and heard, and the paths that users can take, are reasonable but addressable. Vendors must make concern about lock-in a non-issue by keeping their platforms open. If they don't, consumers can just wait awhile. The locks will be picked for them.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags technologywebnetTV

More about AppleBloombergIntelMacsWall Street

Show Comments

Market Place

[]