Financial services firm turning to a private cloud

Munder Capital Management decides that public cloud-based systems aren't enterprise ready

GRAPEVINE, Texas -- Munder Capital Management, a Birmingham, Mich., which manages some $13 billion in assets, is turning to a private cloud after detemining that public cloud technologies aren't yet ready to meet its needs.

Jeffrey Lass, network operations and virtualization engineer at Munder, said that the firm felt that public clouds aren't yet a good option due to regulatory issues around the control of data, a lack adequate service level agreements with cloud providers, and an absence of standard agreements that "allow freedom of movement between providers."

Lass also cited a lack of IT control when a company relies on public cloud services. "We really don't want to be in a position to have to shrug and say 'I don't know' when a system is running slowly," he said at the Storage Networking World conference here this week.

Munder decided to create "a private cloud that has many of the same characteristics of a public cloud but with much higher control, security and availability," said Lass.

IDC analyst Richard Villars said that while his firm projects that the cloud computing market will grow from $23 billion today to about $55 billion in 2014, much of the growth so far has been in new hosted services. Most enterprises aren't yet replacing existing applications with cloud-based offerings, he said.

Villars did note that only a small fraction of spending on cloud systems is for private cloud development.

Villars said the primary issue IT managers face in creating a private cloud is whether to invest in needed converged infrastructure so all the IT assets, storage, servers, networks, are treated as a common resource pool that can be metered and managed in coordinated fashion.

The cost of such an infrastructure is substantial and may be the top obstacle to creating private clouds, according to an IDC survey of users earlier this year. IT departments have money for servers, storage, but not converged infrastructures, said Villars.

At the same time, public cloud computing remains a difficult sell, particularly in regulated industries. For sure, many companies are using hosted services as well as some infrastructure services, such as testing and development. But cloud vendors must still make the case to convince enterprise IT managers to broadly expand use of cloud technologies.

John McGee, a data center manager for regional hospital system, said he is attending the conference to learn more about the cloud environment. At this point, though, "we're not thrilled about [public clouds]," he added.

McGee said his IT environment is still "one throat to choke, mine."

Munder's move to a private cloud is a result of years of work with virtualization technologies, a move to co-location facility, and a refresh hardware equipment. He described that new system as a hybrid approach.

"Ideally, a hybrid solution that can scale to high demand, that's secure, it's reliably delivered, and can be seamlessly provided by multiple hosters, allowing customers to utilize and switch among the providers," said Lass. "This rigidity we fee reinforces our choice of on- premise hosting," he said.

Patrick Thibodeau covers SaaS and enterprise applications, outsourcing, government IT policies, data centers and IT workforce issues for Computerworld. Follow Patrick on Twitter at @DCgov , or subscribe to Patrick's RSS feed . His e-mail address is .

Read more about cloud computing in Computerworld's Cloud Computing Topic Center.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags cloud computinginternetIDCfinanceData CenterFinancial Serviceshardware systemsindustry verticalsConfiguration / maintenanceCapita

Show Comments