TVNZ back catalogue under siege

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Options for archived content discussed at ICT Summit

The New Zealand taxpayer has been paying for television content for 50 years — so who should own that content, and should it be given away to anyone who wants to screen it?

That's the question Paul Brennan, general manager of the internet television network Ziln, put to both ICT Minister Steven Joyce and Telecommunications Commissioner Ross Patterson at the Telecommunications and ICT Summit in Auckland earlier this month.

Both the Minister and the Commissioner ducked the question - the former claiming it wasn't his portfolio, and the regulator that it was a decision for policy makers. But it is one that will have to be considered by the government as New Zealand enters the new era of high speed broadband, where as Brennan points out, the cost of television broadcasting is no longer so expensive it requires government backing to ensure television can be delivered to all citizens.

Ziln TV is a fledgling IPTV service that Brennan says took 10 years to develop, before going live nine months ago. It broadcasts 33 channels and regards itself as a niche player, offering a range of programming that appeals to small communities of interest. It currently attracts between 25,000 and 35,000 unique browsers a month, and Ziln TV'sbiggest boon has been TelstraClear offering the company's broadband subscribers unmetered access to Ziln TV (that is, watching video on Ziln doesn't affect subscriber's monthly data cap).

Brennan says the most popular content is home grown, but he can't get access to NZ on Air funded programming that is screened on the traditional television networks - and he is not impressed with the new Heartland channel on Sky TV screening TVNZ's back catalogue: "We could be playing that free to broadband internet users, [rather] than having to sign up to a pay television channel," he says. "It is sort of robbery, it is a denial of access to what you collectively own."

He questions the need for the government to even own TVNZ (although Minister Joyce was quick to point out that the government keeps its State Owned Enterprises at arms length). "I was asking him (Minister Joyce), hoping he would think about what will be the role of these SOE operations like TVNZ. Will companies like us be competing with them for services that aren't so much about egalitarian distribution of broadcasting, that the taxpayer must contribute to make happen? Do they need to be in that business when the new networks are providing opportunities for content providers and distributors to do the same job."

Kordia CEO Geoff Hunt told the Summit audience that the digital penetration (that is subscribers to SkyTV and Freeview) is estimated to be 69 percent of New Zealand households and that penetration increases by five to six percent annually.
Comments
This is completely inaccurate Some facts:
- Heartland does not air "TVNZ's back catalogue". It airs New Zealand content owned by Producers, New Zealand On Air TVNZ and other rights holders. It airs New Zealand content which has not been commissioned for TVNZ as well as content that has.
- The content in question is owned by various bodies and individuals, who require an agreement to be reached for use of content which they own.
- It is open to anyone to attempt to negotiate access to this content with these content owners. This is what everyone in the media industry does and the way the industry has always operated. It is either that or piracy.
- Certain new players, from time to time, argue- as is done above- that they whould be excempt from the rule of law, i.e not have to negotiate with the rights holders, but just use content freely and without agreement. Legalised piracy.
- There is a huge difference between paying for the production of content- which is what New Zealand On Air (the taxpayer) sometimes does, and origination of content. The fomer usually carries with it some limited ownership of the content, whereas the latter pretty much always involves substantial ownership.
- Brennan very well knows that the legal and appropriate way for him to "get access" to content is to negotiate with the owners of the content. He just thinks he shouldnt have to.
Posted by Anonymous at 14:17:41 on July 13, 2010

Flag abuse

Heartland on Sky but not Freeview? I think Brennan has a point - I imagine that it is only a question of the cost of delivery by Freeview that means that Heartland is only available on Sky. The reality is that IPTV providers like Ziln can do it at a fraction of the cost that Kordia requires to put an additional channel on Freeview. Don't get me wrong - I think Freeview is great. I just also resent paying again to view NZ On Air funded programming on paychannels. In my view, TVNZ don't really take IPTV seriously even though they provide TVNZ OnDemand.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:07:18 on July 13, 2010

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.