Slingshot accused of 'hypocrisy' over XT campaign
LATEST NEWS
- Video will drive UFB uptake, but NZ lacks content choices: ComCom || 1
- TelstraClear's half-year revenue drops by 4 percent, but telco posts $1m profit
- Peter Finch leaves CIO post at Gen-i || 1
- 2degrees announces 875,656 customers
- NZ Fauna app fills 'crazy' lack of animal info || 4
- Megaupload interest a mixed blessing for Pirate Party || 2
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Slingshot says disputes resolution service is flawed
By Rob O'Neill | Auckland | Thursday, 4 March, 2010 | 4 Comments
David Russell, the chairman of the Telecommunications Disputes Resolution Service, has accused telco Slingshot of hypocrisy in its campaign seeking to capitalise on Telecom’s XT network failure.
The campaign encourages Telecom customers to move to Slingshot and to lay a complaint with the Telecommunication Dispute Resolution Scheme (TDRS) about Telecom's poor service.
However, Russell points out today that while Telecom is a member and signatory to the TDRS, Slingshot is not. It withdrew early last year.
David Russell says that some Telecom customers have reason to be annoyed but Slingshot is being hypocritical. He suggests customers think carefully before they switch.
“It’s a bit rich of Slingshot to urge Telecom’s customers to lodge complaints with the TDRS, when Telecom is a signatory to the scheme but Slingshot is not,” he said.
“In fact, since Slingshot left the TDRS the number of complaints against it has risen steadily, but we can’t help these people because Slingshot has elected to back away from the scheme.”
Mark Callander, Slinghot's GM, dismissed the accusation, saying the company has implemented its own "transparent" disputes system.
Callander says the TDRS is flawed in that there is no mediation of disputes. Instead these are escalated until the dispute is resolved and, at the third level of escalation can cost members $1,500 per dispute.
He adds that Slingshot put forward a range of suggestions for reform of the system and left when these were ignored. Callander says other members are planning to leave the service as well.
Russell says that if Slingshot wants to be taken seriously with its marketing pitch it should rejoin and thus offer the same protection to its customers as that given by Telecom.
“Consumers who are contemplating changing to another phone company should always check whether it is a member of the scheme,” David Russell said. “Those who are members, Telecom included, are being socially responsible by giving their customers a degree of independent protection. Slingshot are not.
Ernie Newman, CEO of the Telecommunications Users' Association, says TUANZ was instrumental in setting up the TDRS and is pleased with the spirit in which the three major telcos are supporting it.
A recent addition to the board of the service, Newman says it's ironic that the smaller companies are not giving the scheme the support it deserves and he wants to see the industry as a whole get behind it.
Comments
Who Cares
Slingshots entry into the market is completely lacklustre. I'd be keen to see how many clients they have, i don't know anyone with a slingshot or a Black and White cell phone....
Perhaps Slingshot could ditch their funny little white stick people for a some story along the david and goliath story.... the big boys get taken down by a slingshot.
Anyway who cares....
Posted by Anonymous at 9:59:39 on March 8, 2010
Perhaps Slingshot could ditch their funny little white stick people for a some story along the david and goliath story.... the big boys get taken down by a slingshot.
Anyway who cares....
Posted by Anonymous at 9:59:39 on March 8, 2010
TDRS is flawed, and expensive
What David fails to acknowledge is what Callendar has mentioned - if a disgruntled customer doesn't like it they can keep turning down resolution offers until it gets to the point it costs the ISP much more than the original issue, and they give in - whether the complaint is valid or not.
The scheme is too expensive, and is fatally flawed.
Posted by Karl at 13:17:44 on March 5, 2010
The scheme is too expensive, and is fatally flawed.
Posted by Karl at 13:17:44 on March 5, 2010
Re: TDRS is flawed, and expensive
So why is Slingshot encouraging people to use it, then?
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro at 12:38:57 on March 6, 2010
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro at 12:38:57 on March 6, 2010
Slingshot accused of 'hypocrisy' over XT campaign
hypocrisy to the hilt - just a petty competitor trying to raise its profile by dubious means..
Posted by clive beretta at 7:27:09 on March 5, 2010
Posted by clive beretta at 7:27:09 on March 5, 2010
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.







