Android boosted, iPad dismissed at PredICTions night

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Wellington's Brenda Wallace cruises to victory in predictions contest

Well-known Wellington geek Brenda Wallace cruised to victory for the second year running, in developer group Unlimited Potential’s contest for the best predictions for ICT in the year ahead.

The annual PredICTtions event attracted five contenders, including new entrant Joanna McLeod, known for her Hubris and Prettyprettypretty blogs and major contribution to the Wellingtonista site.

Other runners up were Geekzone founder Mauricio Freitas, web designer Philip Fierlinger (www.turntablemedia.com) and web trainer and advisor Miraz Jordan, all previous contenders.

For the first time the audience could vote digitally on laptops supplied at the venue, so the winner was decided on an objective count, rather than by subjective evaluation of applause volume.

A growing number of organisations, especially government agencies, will choose open-source software during 2010, for the wrong reasons, Wallace predicts. Referring to the Public Sector Remix open-source desktop trial, she says, “I suspect they’re doing it because Microsoft wouldn’t give them the price they wanted. I hope they’ll stay open-source, because it gives them freedom and control and breaks a monopoly.”

Libraries will begin renting e-books, she says. More tablet computers will enter the market, running “quasi-operating systems” such as Google’s Android rather than full-blown Linux, Apple or Windows; “but users won’t know or care about the OS; they’ll just use [the devices].”

The move to open government “will get creepy”, Wallace says, observers will “stalk” politicians, reporting their movements through Twitter and other real-time forums. “I’d like to see them do it to the lobbyists,” she says; “I’d like to know who they’re having lunch with.”

“We’ll have robots in our houses doing our bidding,” Wallace says, pointing to the Roomba vacuum cleaner as an early example.

Lastly, she predicts New Zealand, in technology and elsewhere, will continue to be a follower of overseas trends. “We think it’s not okay to do it until someone else does it first. Sadly, I think New Zealand’s going to keep saying that.”

Philip Fierlinger puts his bet on the Chrome operating system with its web user interface for future tablet computers, rather than following Apple’s iPad lead. “I don’t see the iPad as a game-changer the way the iPhone was,” he says. “I see kids having Chrome-tops for school” with all data stored on a remote server “and iPhones for cool”.

He says a resurgent consciousness of user privacy will drive people away from services like Facebook that seek to monetise their information.

By the end of 2010, Miraz Jordan says, Telecom’s XT network will be up 99 percent of the time and TelstraClear would have solved the problem that makes it impossible to view YouTube videos without stuttering.

Jordan canvassed the views of her blog readers and one – identified only as Stephanie – suggests this country and particularly Wellington, could become the hub of an international three-dimensional printing market, building on the RepRap printer.

Freitas predicts the rise of the Android operating system and the iPhone at the expense of Windows and Symbian-based mobile phones.

In contrast to Fierlinger, Freitas expects regard for privacy to diminish, with information of all kinds either volunteered or gathered continuously. “Your life will be broadcast from your pocket,” he says.

McLeod’s predictions include a continuing stream of gadgets in pink aimed at the female market and the expanding use of SMS by government agencies to communicate with citizens. She says digital conversations will be such a common way of arranging face-to-face meetings that it will no longer be seen as distinctive. “We won’t have Tweet ups any more, they’ll just be called ‘Friday night drinks’.”
Comments
Back to front Quite why a 'predictions' contest is scored on predictions themselves and not on their actual accuracy is beyond me. With only 5 contestants it sounds like a little ego building to me.
Posted by Allister at 21:28:46 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Video of Bloggers Predict 2010 Video of Bloggers Predict 2010 event here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjLG9O-tbes
Posted by Tim at 13:56:04 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

WTF? How can you be eliteist for believing there right and wrong reasons for any decision, isn't that just common sense.

The right reason to have a drink is for being sociable and enjoying the taste.
The wrong reason for having a drink is to get drunk.

Elitist or common sense?
Posted by WTF? at 13:55:56 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Typical Patronising Elitists In the real world, real people don't give a toss whether a piece of software gives them "freedom". They want it to work.
And elitist attitudes towards those who do not embrace their church are patronising and offend those unbelievers, and are a brilliant illustration of why many reject the zealotry.
Posted by LeftyBanana at 11:46:40 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Typical Patronising Elitists I'm afraid I don't share you smear of free software supporters. I see it as a few smart and community-minded people who work hard to provide an alternative to corporate domination and total commercialisation of your computing experience. You (and other "non-elitists") benefit from the work of these few. Sort of how all US citizens benefited from the work of a few civil rights activists, or all kiwi women benefited from the work of a few dedicated, principled suffragettes who convinced the establishment to give women the right to participate in democracy.

Please don't equate support for the principles of free software with religion. Free software offers tangible, repeatable, indisputable benefits for everyone. If you consider that elitist, that's your prerogative, but I believe you're guilty of being glib and unfairly dismissive. I consider supporters of free software to be visionary, socially conscious, generous, and, as it happens, the people defining our future.
Posted by Dave Lane at 11:58:57 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Typical Patronising Elitists What I am being Dave, is critical of an attitude that says Government is choosing open source but for the WRONG REASONS.
Anyone who takes that sort of attitude is elitist, because they're dictating that there are RIGHT REASONS and WRONG REASONS to choose a product. And what Brenda's quoted as saying is that price is the wrong reason, and freedom and control are the right reasons. And telling a customer they chose your product for the wrong reasons is terribly patronising.
Posted by LeftyBanana at 12:08:50 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Typical Patronising Elitists with their cheap shoes! "What I am being Dave, is critical of an attitude that says Government is choosing open source but for the WRONG REASONS ...."
would you prefer the term "..for a LESS GOOD REASON" or "A REASON THATS OF NO MORE OR LESS VALUE OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING"...Its pretty easy being elitist nowadays,
all you have to do is have an opinion ..So back to work with you peons
Posted by Bruce Lee at 14:07:07 on February 23, 2010

Flag abuse

Typical Patronising Elitists Thanks for your response, Leftybanana... It seems to me that part of the reason that Gov't IT is such a mess - with most of the data that the gov't holds in trust for the people of NZ is locked into proprietary formats (which give overseas corporates huge leverage over the gov't with regard to "bulk deals") requiring the kiwi taxpayer to foot the "monopoly rents" charged for the necessary software... is because people have all along made purchasing decisions for all the wrong reasons. They haven't prioritised open standards, they haven't prioritised interoperability, and we are now paying the price (and suffering the inconvenience/cost of many mutually incompatible systems... looked under the bonnet at your local DHB's IT systems recently?) You might consider it elitist, I simply consider it smart people attempting to promote good practice among people, who seem very relucant to learn from their past mistakes, and are, after all, spending *our* money.
Posted by Dave Lane at 15:47:05 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Misrepresentation I've checked coverage from last year and you appear to be right. Offending sentence deleted.

Ed
Posted by Rob O'Neill at 10:28:20 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Misquotation Brenda Wallace did not say the word 'cloud' would disappear, she stated that we would all be sick of the word 'cloud' by the end of the year. Please change this.

-a friend of Brenda
Posted by Tamara Olliver at 10:17:49 on February 17, 2010

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.