Wireless company Exicom hits debt wall
LATEST NEWS
- Video will drive UFB uptake, but NZ lacks content choices: ComCom || 1
- TelstraClear's half-year revenue drops by 4 percent, but telco posts $1m profit
- Peter Finch leaves CIO post at Gen-i || 1
- 2degrees announces 875,656 customers
- NZ Fauna app fills 'crazy' lack of animal info || 4
- Megaupload interest a mixed blessing for Pirate Party || 2
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Receiver hopes for sale as going concern
By Stephen Bell | Wellington | Friday, 9 April, 2010 | 1 Comment
Porirua-based wireless communications developer Exicom has run into debt problems, resulting in a receiver being appointed to its holding company.
“Exicom Technologies itself is not in receivership, but it’s a wholly-owned subsidiary of Exicom Holdings, which is in receivership,” says receiver Tony Harris.
This course was chosen because it was judged to be in the best interests of the lender, he says. The creditor in question is long-established trade financier S H Lock NZ Ltd.
Exicom, which designs, manufactures and exports a range of VHF, UHF and microwave wireless systems, has a storied history, dating back to 1913 when AWA established a business in New Zealand, developing radio equipment for the Post Office. In 1988 Australian firm Exicom purchased the business, but then found itself in financial trouble in 1996.
Employees and members of the the Porirua community then bought the company's assets from the receiver and set up Exicom Technologies.
Harris says he was appointed receiver to the holding company just before Easter and he is still sorting through the various strands of the company.
The hope is that the company might be saleable as a going concern.
“That’s always the preferred course in a receivership or debt enforcement,” he says.
Harris says he might have a clearer idea of the course ahead by the end of next week.
Comments
exicom
It should be noted that this TRICK of not putting exicom technologies into receivership
means that -
Staff are denied all rights under receivership - eg claiming holiday pay etc
Staff cannot apply for income support as they are still employed
Staff were sent home before easter after working 4 days without hope of payment with the receivers knowledge.
What kind of mam / company does that?
Exicom technologies
Posted by Anonymous at 21:23:15 on April 14, 2010
means that -
Staff are denied all rights under receivership - eg claiming holiday pay etc
Staff cannot apply for income support as they are still employed
Staff were sent home before easter after working 4 days without hope of payment with the receivers knowledge.
What kind of mam / company does that?
Exicom technologies
Posted by Anonymous at 21:23:15 on April 14, 2010
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.







