Methods untried in NZ tipped for fibre rollouts
LATEST NEWS
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Upcoming fibre projects may be done differently
By Stephen Bell | Wellington | Monday, 28 June, 2010 | 10 Comments
As the time nears when the ultra-fast broadband initiative and its counterpart Rural Broadband Initiative will move into practical implementation, the Ministry of Economic Development (MED) is preparing participants for what may be unfamiliar techniques of fibre deployment, never before tried in New Zealand.
Such techniques, including microtrenching and shallow trenching, are advisable to minimise the cost and deployment time of what will be an expensive network development.
Between 50 and 80 percent of the cost of deploying fibre broadband infrastructure is in the civil works associated with trenching fibre-optic cable or stringing cable overhead from poles, says MED.
As such, it aims to set up a number of projects to develop deployment standards and test them in advance, through pilot projects.
Standards will assist the several parties that may be involved in development under the control of different local fibre companies to work in a consistent and efficient way. The presence of consistent standards will also help overcome potential concern by local authorities at the use of unfamiliar techniques and facilitate necessary approvals.
Microtrenching, for example, involves laying fibre in narrow but deep saw-cuts in the seal at the side of roads. This may give territorial local authorities cause for concern that the integrity of the roading system will be affected and that work of unpredictable duration and impact will be taking place.
“Infrastructure companies have expressed a desire to have certainty regarding the regulations and consent terms that will be required for a wide-scale deployment,” says MED. “Many of these companies have expressed concerns over the costs and delays that accrue as a result of the variation across Territorial Local Authorities in consenting approaches or planning requirements.”
A coherent set of well-tested standards, MED expects, will smooth these obstacles.
“It is intended that the standards developed would ultimately be fed into the National Code of Practice for Utilities’ Access to Transport Corridors (the ‘Utilities Code’), to be given regulatory status under the Utilities Access Act 2010,” says MED in a document requesting expressions of interest from organisations wanting to be involved in the development and testing process.
The Utilities Access Act is planned to firm up a hitherto voluntary code for utilities’ access to transport corridors.
The deployment standards initiative will be jointly run by MED and the Digital Auckland Working Party, a coalition of organisations established last year with expertise in the application of telecommunications and ICT as applied to broadband deployment.
It is envisaged a standards working group and a separate group to run testing will work under an overall project coordination group. As standards are developed, the testing group will conduct laboratory tests, followed by small pilot deployment projects in selected areas.
Local authorities are expected to play a significant role in the pilots, says MED.
The ministry is seeking expressions of interest from parties who wish to participate in the proposed deployment pilot investigations and/or the standards development work.
A request for proposals will be issued in about August, “detailing the government’s requirements and inviting bids from parties interested in participating and contributing to particular pilot investigations,” says MED.
Standards for each of the deployment techniques will be developed through a series of workshops and progress reported to all interested parties through a project website.
After standards definition and pilot projects, a good-practice guide is expected to be issued by April next year.
Comments
do it once, do it right
all the corporate bull of protecting profits is what got telecom seperated anyway.
they didn't look after the consumers and didnt invest in new infrastructure.
does the govt have to step in every time to sort out the squabbling kids in the snadpit
grow up, hurry up and do it bloody right for all for your customers and prospective customers.
Posted by soapbyte at 9:37:26 on July 4, 2010
they didn't look after the consumers and didnt invest in new infrastructure.
does the govt have to step in every time to sort out the squabbling kids in the snadpit
grow up, hurry up and do it bloody right for all for your customers and prospective customers.
Posted by soapbyte at 9:37:26 on July 4, 2010
I believe Australia has a law that forces any trenching to be available to all
So if One Telco digs up a road and puts ducting in - it has to be available to everyone else.
Mind you I have spoken to a NZ Telco rep who told me that his organisation purposely did not use ducting so that no other Telco could use it in future.
Posted by Paul at 13:23:16 on July 2, 2010
Mind you I have spoken to a NZ Telco rep who told me that his organisation purposely did not use ducting so that no other Telco could use it in future.
Posted by Paul at 13:23:16 on July 2, 2010
there's a reason to do trenching properly
it's called reliability. If fibre is important, at least do it properly. What will network reliability and maintenance be like on microtrenching... a shallow slit under the tarseal in a rainy country is not going to be robust for too long...
Posted by Anonymous at 6:09:03 on July 1, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 6:09:03 on July 1, 2010
fibre rollout
Yes it is about the biggest bang for their buck (read 'as much fibre laid as possible') and is also about rolling out the fibre infrastructure as quickly as possible. Given the absolute importance of high speed broadband, particularly in our rural areas, this would seem to be an admirable thing for the government to seek do!
Posted by ruralconnect.org.nz at 13:59:47 on June 29, 2010
Posted by ruralconnect.org.nz at 13:59:47 on June 29, 2010
trenching
how about starting by passing a law that forces all interested parties to lay cable or ducting while a street is opened up, and prevent that street from being dug up more than once every 5 years.. too many times i see a street get re-paved, followed by subsequent dig ups to lay cables etc. surely cheaper for the economy overall to do it once. traffic disruption on its own is a significant problem
Posted by regs at 12:20:28 on June 28, 2010
Posted by regs at 12:20:28 on June 28, 2010
trenching
what about a precat or poured footpath U section that can have its lid opened by a simple hiab and all utilities use put their ducting in this. loads of space and easy to find and repair faults. expesive to lay but cheaper ove 30 years.
Posted by Anonymous at 16:57:22 on June 28, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 16:57:22 on June 28, 2010
trenching
Governments don't work that way.
They are interested in the biggest bang for the smallest buck that will keep the average voter happy by the time the next election rocks along
Posted by Jays at 9:00:26 on June 29, 2010
They are interested in the biggest bang for the smallest buck that will keep the average voter happy by the time the next election rocks along
Posted by Jays at 9:00:26 on June 29, 2010
trenching
I think it's about laying a basic ducting system that can then be used by anything else that comes along later on.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:32:58 on June 28, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 13:32:58 on June 28, 2010
trenching
Of course the other requirement should be to consolidate all existing overhead wiring into a trench where there are still legacy power poles so as to remove the danger and unsightliness of power poles from the community. Stringing fibre along existing poles is not really an acceptable alternative.
Posted by David at 12:20:17 on July 1, 2010
Posted by David at 12:20:17 on July 1, 2010
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.







