IE9 proves Microsoft is back in the browser battle, says analyst

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Support for HTML5 puts Microsoft in front, argues Forrester's McLeish

Microsoft is back in the browser race, an analyst said today after the company unveiled a rough developer's preview of its next browser, IE9.

"They want to be more than a follower or just on features parity," said Forrester analyst Sheri McLeish as she talked about what she saw as a recommitment to Internet Explorer (IE). "And they've created a whole new team for IE. Microsoft is clearly taking the browser seriously again."

Among the newer faces on the IE team, said McLeish, is Ted Johnson, the co-founder of Visio and from January 2000 to March 2003, a corporate vice president at Microsoft. Johnson, who according to his LinkedIn account rejoined Microsoft in August 2008, now carries the title Partner PM Architect on IE, and is the senior architect responsible for the browser's graphics and rendering.

"Microsoft has lined up some very experienced engineers" for the IE team, McLeish said. "It's really a crack team."

The renewed emphasis shows that Microsoft is taking its browser, and the competition in the browser market, seriously.

"You want that real estate," McLeish said, adding that IE is important to Microsoft, something others have questioned. "It's important from a pure visibility and branding angle. The browser is the way to promote search, for Microsoft that means Bing, and of course Microsoft has an interest in creating the best experience it can within Windows."

Microsoft may not believe that only its engineers can create the best Windows browser, but it certainly thinks they're up to the task. As proof, McLeish noted the hardware acceleration Microsoft's touting for IE9.

Earlier today, Dean Hachamovich, the general manager for IE development, spelled out IE9's performance enhancements during a 40-minute presentation at MIX10, the Web developer conference Microsoft kicked off on Monday. Among them: background JavaScript compiling on a separate processor core, graphics processor acceleration of text and graphic rendering, and an upcoming update to the IE9 preview for hardware acceleration of HTML 5 video.

"IE9 is exponentially faster at dynamic rendering than its predecessor," said McLeish. "It's very slick, very speedy."

Hachamovich repeated a claim made last fall by his boss, Stephen Sinofsky, Microsoft's president of Windows, that IE9 had essentially closed the enormous JavaScript performance gap between itself and rivals made by Mozilla, Google and Apple . Today, Hachamovich showed a slide during his keynote that put IE9's platform preview as slightly faster than Firefox 3.6, slightly slower than Safari, Chrome and Opera 10.5 on the SunSpider JavaScript benchmarks.

"We're faster than many other browsers," Hachamovich said, pointing to the slide. "And we've only done a little bit of optimization for SunSpider so far."

On other browser benchmarks, IE9 has a longer way to go. According to Hachamovich, IE9 Platform Preview's Acid3 score is now at 55 out of a possible 100. Last fall, Sinofsky said the internal build of IE9 scored 32 out of 100.

The Acid3 benchmark checks how closely a browser follows certain standards, particularly specifications for Web 2.0 applications, as well as standards related to DOM (Document Object Model), CSS2 (Cascading Style Sheets) and SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics).

But it was HTML5 that Hachamovich repeatedly hammered home during his time on stage. "We planned IE9 from the ground up for HTML5," he said, talking about the still-unfinished revision of the Web's core markup language.

"It's almost an about-face," said McLeish of Microsoft's taking to HTML5. "Microsoft was not about to jump on the latest greatest thing just because enthusiasts clamored for it, but after some thoughtful review and the pressures of the market, they reevaluated their browser's capabilities, took a hard look at HTML5 and decided there was a lot of potential there."

McLeish saw the shift to support HTML5 as more evidence that Microsoft wants to be a leader in the browser race. "I'd argue that they're in the forefront with IE9," McLeish said. "Certainly, [Google's] Chrome and [Mozilla's] Firefox have their own labs, but I think Microsoft is out front in presenting this to developers. It's an affirmation that they're planning to give HTML5 their full support."

The IE9 Platform Preview can be downloaded from Microsoft's Web site and run within Windows 7 , Windows Server 2008 R2 or Vista Service Pack 2 (SP2). The preview is not a full-fledged browser, but essentially a frame for showing off the new browser's JavaScript and rendering engines.

"I think this shows that Microsoft is serious again about innovation," said McLeish. "And when Microsoft gets serious about something, you'd better be ready to get out of the way."

Microsoft has its work cut out for it in reclaiming its once overwhelmingly-dominant lead in browsers. IE has lost approximately 8 percentage points of share as measured by NetApplications.com in the last 12 months, and now accounts for about 62% of all browsers in use. Even the introduction of IE8 a year ago hasn't stemmed the losses.

Comments
Playing catch-up This thoughtful review indicates that, yes, this alpha IE9 developer release looks like a big step in the right direction, there's still a long way to go. The IE team is trailing years behind the rest of the pack. Apparently, In key areas of web standards compliance (like SVG native support), IE9 eventually hopes to achieve roughly the level of Firefox 1.5 (released several years ago) - the current release of Firefox is 3.6. http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2010/03/16/a-long-road-behind-a-long-road-ahead/
Posted by Dave Lane at 19:58:51 on March 18, 2010

Flag abuse

Playing catch-up This thoughtful review indicates that although IE9 looks like a big step in the right direction, but the IE team is way behind the rest of the pack. Apparently, In key areas of web standards compliance (like SVG native support), IE9 eventually hopes to achieve roughly the level of Firefox 1.5 (released several years ago).

http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2010/03/16/a-long-road-behind-a-long-road-ahead/
Posted by Dave Lane at 19:57:07 on March 18, 2010

Flag abuse

Another pundit's take on IE9 vs. the FOSS competition a fair but somewhat less glowing review of IE9: http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2010/03/internet-explorer-9-vs-firefox.html
Posted by Dave Lane at 19:53:16 on March 18, 2010

Flag abuse

Welcome to the bandwagon, Microsoft Congratulations, Microsoft, for deciding (finally) to join the rest of the browsers at the forefront of web technology by supporting the existing and proposed open web standards. You're moving towards no longer being the web's biggest handbrake.

I give you props for realising that the "create our own proprietary standards" (e.g. Silverlight and ActiveX and broken HTML/CSS support) aren't making you more popular with anyone. But this breathless article seems to suggest that you will not only catch up with but storm past the current state of the art browsers...

Hmm. Let's not forget that Microsoft is currently at least a couple years behind Firefox, Safari, Chrome, and Opera in terms of web standards support... For instance, all of those browsers support native SVG (look ma, no plugin) and have done so for a couple years. IE9 *might*. Same with HTML5, and Canvas and that pesky video tag that threatens to dilute the control of Microsoft and Apple by using a non-patent-encumbered video codec like Ogg Theora!

Great to see that IE9's picked up its abysmal game in the Javascript stakes... Of course those other browsers are converging on lightening fast Javascript support... but IE9's code is competing in benchmarks against released code from other browsers... I don't think that those other browser development teams are standing still on Javascript - I think McLeish is spreading it a bit thick on this point.

And how is Microsoft "out in front" presenting an IE9 alpha to its developers? Both Chrome/Chromium and Firefox (not sure about Safari and Opera) have fully open development cycles. Every nightly build is available to anyone interested. How does MS's IE9 preview "put them in front?" Sycophancy.

IE7 and IE8 were steps in the right direction, but both were vastly underwhelming. Lots of web standards compliance/support was promised, and far less delivered. Seems that the approach is something like this: promise a lot more than you can deliver but enough to make it look like you're "in the game", to stem the tide of defections. Then, following a disappointing release, whip up the PR machine to promise a lot more for the next as-yet-unreleased version... rinse and repeat. Some people never learn.

Posted by Dave Lane at 10:05:14 on March 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Welcome to the bandwagon, Microsoft Hey Dave,

Good point on the bit about the others being *released* already...

Heres a link to the preview, which you too, as a non-microsoft developer, can try out. So you're incorrect in suggesting that its limited to its developers only.

http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/#svg11e2

Would be nice to see you retract at least that incorrect part of your post. Not that you will, since judging by your comments on this and other articles on this site, you're clearly a very opinionated person, and that opinion is barbed, and aimed squarely at Microsoft. One wonders what they did to you to make you hate them so much. Did Bill Gates steal your wife or something?


Posted by Don't be so hasty at 10:21:13 on March 17, 2010

Flag abuse

Welcome to the bandwagon, Microsoft Heh.

I didn't mean to imply that their release is Developer-only, but simply that they've made a specific release, rather than have an entirely open development cycle (where every nightly build is available, source code and everything) like the other browsers I mentioned. I don't see why their release is to be congratulated.

Thanks for the link to the testcentre - but of course, I don't run MS Windows, so I guess I *can't* test it... ah well.

And yes, well spotted: I dislike the Microsoft Corporation.

I have a lot of time for some of their employees who are smart, nice folks, though perhaps not overly concerned with the ethics of their employer (I'm in NZ via Seattle, and have quite a few friends who work(ed) there).

I founded and have been running a FOSS business here in NZ for the past 11 years and I've seen all the nasty things Microsoft've done to keep the playing field slanted in their favour. I'm quite comfortable asserting that anyone who's been watching them as long as I have would develop the same disdain for them and their willingness to eschew ethics for maintaining monopoly profits.

By the way, I'd be more impressed by your post if you stated your real name.
Posted by Dave Lane at 12:31:20 on March 17, 2010

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.