Federated Farmers ditches Telecom in favour of Vodafone

Vodafone to tailor pricing plans for Federated Farmers' membership

Federated Farmers has dropped Telecom in favour of Vodafone, ending a commercial relationship of well over a decade.

“I’ve been at Federated Farmers for 14 years and I don’t know that we’ve ever switched supplier before,” says telecommunications spokesman Anders Crofoot.

The parties had been working through a tender process for around six months.

Crofoot says Vodafone had suggested a number of changes Federated Farmers should make internally that saved the organisation a considerable amount of money.

He wouldn’t disclose the full value of the contract, which sees Vodafone become a premier partner. It will provide fixed line and mobile services to the Federation, while designing a tailored pricing plan for its full membership.

Vodafone replaces Telecom as a top-tier sponsor.

“It was an attractive offer they made,” says Crofoot. “They’re making a strong push into the rural market. They’re putting on a real push in terms of cellphone coverage.

“Vodafone claims it has equal coverage to Telecom, so it came down to services, quality and cost.”

Vodafone already supports organisations such as Young Farmers, Rural Women, Rural Contractors and the Rural GP Network.

Federated Farmers CEO Connor English says telecommunications and broadband are absolutely critical for rural communities and businesses.

“Federated Farmers advocated successfully for increased investment in rural broadband, greater competition and improved mobile phone coverage. We now want to see a sensible release of the digital dividend spectrum to ensure that our rural communities can participate fully in the advance of technology.”

Under the six-year Rural Broadband Initiative, Vodafone will deliver wireless broadband through 154 new cell sites and manage 387 upgrades to existing infrastructure. To date, there are 19 new RBI sites and 130 upgrades made to existing sites, servicing more than 80,000 address points across rural New Zealand.

Comments

Anonymous

1

"Vodafone claims it has equal coverage to Telecom, so it came down to services, quality and cost." Interesting. If you browse the cell tower maps looking at smaller towns you find that Telecom have cell towers in town while Vodafone have them on the outskirts. Coverage area might be OK for calls but useless for data. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22487235/fusion.html - shows much more blue than red (even ignoring the 2degrees towers)

Anonymous

2

I run a small team if couriers, some urban but mostly rural coverage. We have about 50:50 Telecom and Voda. Voda guys are always complaining on no signal and dropped calls. I don't think Voda are up-front with their customers about their network.

Anonymous

3

A moderate sized revenue loss, but a huge dent in perceptions in the rural market.

Anonymous

4

and I can tell you that Telecom's network is a better network. Now the new RNCs are in and it is stable it offers, in my view, the best coverage of any NZ 3G network.

Unfortunately, it all comes down to cost. Don't forget you get what you pay for.

Comments are now closed.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Whitepapers
All whitepapers

Kordia pulls Te Puni Kokiri out of GSN bind

READ THIS ARTICLE
DO NOT SHOW THIS BOX AGAIN [ x ]
Sign up now to get free exclusive access to reports, research and invitation only events.

Computerworld newsletter

Join the most dedicated community for IT managers, leaders and professionals in New Zealand