NZICT says patents 'integral' to software protection

Vendor group says move is a major policy change and calls for wider consultation

IT vendor group NZICT is warning that a move to abandon software patents in New Zealand is "worrying".

A Commerce Select Committee recently recommended the government to remove patent protection for software. However, NZICT chief executive Brett O'Riley says the country's software development sector deserves the same protection as other sectors where invention and innovation occurs.

"Software patents, while acknowledged as a less than perfect solution in some areas, are none-the-less integral to an individual or company's right for commercial protection and essential for competing globally. We believe that it is very important that companies retain the option to protect their innovations under patent law, if that is their choice," he says in a statement.

O'Riley says he is perplexed by the recommendation, as it contravenes current New Zealand economic policy and contradicts the policy to continue software patents which had been confirmed in 2005 after industry consultation.

He also warns that the wider implications of such a law change is inconsistent with the policy of our trade partners and may have an impact on New Zealand's ability to negotiate trade agreements.

"New Zealand's ability to trade and compete internationally in the digital economy depends upon a supportive legislative environment that harnesses and recognises New Zealand ingenuity and innovation," he says.

O'Riley urges the government to rethink the implications of removing software patents if it is serious about supporting New Zealand's innovators and economic growth for the nation.

Abandoning software patents is a major policy change. NZICT is concerned that the software industry has not been consulted sufficiently on this change and recommends the Government be cautious to ensure that it is acting in the interests of the industry as a whole.

3 Comments

Dave Lane

1

I'm sorry, Brett. Your assertion about the need for "a supportive legislative environment" which includes software patents is not compelling unless you can provide evidence to support it. Why is copyright not sufficient? Seems to be for authors of books, music, and films...How does software differ from these?

To those reading this article, it's important that you recognise that the NZICT association does not represent most kiwi IT businesses. I can tell you, Brett, that you're certainly not representing my business' interests. Your organisational constitution ensures that your "Tier One" and a small proportion of your Tier Two member organisations dictate your policy and your voice.

90+% of NZ (i.e. non-multinational) IT businesses would never be able to afford membership above General Member status, making it fiscally impossible for your organisation to *actually* represent the New Zealand IT industry interests over those of multinationals who do business in NZ. Perhaps it's best if you accept this, and that our government takes your advice with a major grain of salt.

For those wanting to confirm this for themselves, see here: http://www.ict.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/nzict-rules-for-15-dec1.pdf

Anonymous

2

Lawrence, please don't continue to show your ignorance ..

If you really don't know what the difference is between a patent (for an idea or method) and copyright protection (for the expression of a particular instance of that idea or method), you should not be commenting in the first place.

Yes, the software patent needs to be restricted to a narrow range of novel methods. And No, that is not the same as "No Software Patents". Read the draft legislation ..

Lawrence D'Oliveiro

3

Software is already "protected" by copyright, why does it need patent "protection" as well? Nothing else we create has the ability to double-dip the legal system in this way.

Comments are now closed

Eight years on, Drury welcomes Xero #1000...

READ THIS ARTICLE
DO NOT SHOW THIS BOX AGAIN [ x ]